Prepare for the CAS Exam 6 with detailed study materials. Use flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations, to get exam-ready!

Multiple Choice

What is the concern about rate increases up to 20 percent per year under NFIP?

Raising premiums at a rate cap tests the ability of a public insurance program to fund its future obligations. Even with annual increases of up to 20%, the NFIP would still face a shortfall because catastrophe risk can generate losses far larger than what current or gradually rising premiums cover, and the program carries existing debt from past flood events. It takes time and larger rate signals to move toward true risk-based pricing and to build sufficient reserves for big, infrequent losses. So the concern is that these increases wouldn’t be enough to make the funds fully cover future obligations. This is why the best answer states that such increases would still leave funds insufficient to cover obligations. The other ideas aren’t as accurate: premium hikes don’t instantly eliminate subsidies, they aren’t primarily about private market capacity, and the changes would have some positive effect on solvency even if not enough to close the gap.

Raising premiums at a rate cap tests the ability of a public insurance program to fund its future obligations. Even with annual increases of up to 20%, the NFIP would still face a shortfall because catastrophe risk can generate losses far larger than what current or gradually rising premiums cover, and the program carries existing debt from past flood events. It takes time and larger rate signals to move toward true risk-based pricing and to build sufficient reserves for big, infrequent losses. So the concern is that these increases wouldn’t be enough to make the funds fully cover future obligations.

This is why the best answer states that such increases would still leave funds insufficient to cover obligations. The other ideas aren’t as accurate: premium hikes don’t instantly eliminate subsidies, they aren’t primarily about private market capacity, and the changes would have some positive effect on solvency even if not enough to close the gap.